This Just In: the cutest picture of Bill and Hillary ever.
Start. Gushing. Now.
(Visited 4 times, 1 visits today)
38 thoughts on “This Just In: the cutest picture of Bill and Hillary ever.”
Lindsey
If they get elected, I’m moving back to Europe. OBAMA ’08
Lindsey
If they get elected, I’m moving back to Europe. OBAMA ’08
Anonymous
I suggest you get comfortable in the kitchen.Quite comfortable in the kitchen, thanks; naked or clothed!
Anonymous
I suggest you get comfortable in the kitchen.
Quite comfortable in the kitchen, thanks; naked or clothed!
Anonymous
I didn’t mean showing him up politically, i meant literally tearing his balls off. And I am quite comfortable in the kitchen. After all, it’s my girlfriend that has to cook in the nude.
Anonymous
I didn’t mean showing him up politically, i meant literally tearing his balls off.
And I am quite comfortable in the kitchen. After all, it’s my girlfriend that has to cook in the nude.
Xiaoxi
emasculating Bill? into the testicle lock box? FYI: We’re not in the 50s anymore!say what you will about Hillary’s policies, ideas, experience, but let me assure you, showing that you’re threatened by a powerful woman is utterly irrelevant. I suggest you get comfortable in the kitchen.
Xiaoxi
emasculating Bill? into the testicle lock box? FYI: We’re not in the 50s anymore!
say what you will about Hillary’s policies, ideas, experience, but let me assure you, showing that you’re threatened by a powerful woman is utterly irrelevant.
I suggest you get comfortable in the kitchen.
steadyjohn
Probably emasculating Bill, if I had to guess..into the “Testicle Lock Box” LOL
steadyjohn
Probably emasculating Bill, if I had to guess
..into the “Testicle Lock Box” LOL
Anonymous
Well, at least today her outside is closer to representing her inside appearance.
Anonymous
Well, at least today her outside is closer to representing her inside appearance.
Anonymous
Probably emasculating Bill, if I had to guess.
Anonymous
Probably emasculating Bill, if I had to guess.
Anonymous
hahahaha anonymous@3:29. I love you.
Anonymous
hahahaha anonymous@3:29. I love you.
Anonymous
where’s hil’s right hand?
Anonymous
where’s hil’s right hand?
noa
Justin – I also mistook those for your words, after the first paragraphs. Maybe it was the line breaks.
noa
Justin – I also mistook those for your words, after the first paragraphs. Maybe it was the line breaks.
Anonymous
i like that you can see the imprint of the hammock on bill’s arm.
Anonymous
i like that you can see the imprint of the hammock on bill’s arm.
Anonymous
I don’t care how fucking cute they are, they’re still fucking fascists.
Anonymous
I don’t care how fucking cute they are, they’re still fucking fascists.
Justin
With respect, Anonymous @ 1:30, I didn’t “say” anything.Joel Garreau of the Washington Post wrote something about the photo, and I found it interesting. The words and beliefs are his. I would caution you against making assumptions about things that I’d “say” or “believe” based on an article published in the WaPo’s Arts section.I would also caution you against assuming that I “haven’t been paying attention.” :-P
Justin
With respect, Anonymous @ 1:30, I didn’t “say” anything.
Joel Garreau of the Washington Post wrote something about the photo, and I found it interesting. The words and beliefs are his. I would caution you against making assumptions about things that I’d “say” or “believe” based on an article published in the WaPo’s Arts section.
I would also caution you against assuming that I “haven’t been paying attention.” :-P
Anonymous
Justin: what you say is true, but if you still believe that photojournalism isn’t nearly always staged, then you haven’t been paying attention. Unless you want to openly question every photo you see – and feel free to do so, though it takes a lot of work – what matters most is the image itself. I certainly won’t go so far as to say that the method of production is irrelevant, but unless the photo is actively doctored or otherwise fraudulent then it’s pretty much fair game. In fact, I find it downright strange that the Post bothered to mention the circumstances surrounding the shot.
Anonymous
Justin: what you say is true, but if you still believe that photojournalism isn’t nearly always staged, then you haven’t been paying attention.
Unless you want to openly question every photo you see – and feel free to do so, though it takes a lot of work – what matters most is the image itself. I certainly won’t go so far as to say that the method of production is irrelevant, but unless the photo is actively doctored or otherwise fraudulent then it’s pretty much fair game. In fact, I find it downright strange that the Post bothered to mention the circumstances surrounding the shot.
Anonymous
I don’t know why, but I just can’t stand that woman
Anonymous
I don’t know why, but I just can’t stand that woman
Anonymous
god, people are so sad these days
Anonymous
god, people are so sad these days
Justin
From the Washington Post:Take, for example, his 1992 photo of Hillary and Bill Clinton. What you see is an awww-inspiring photo of two people who seem very much in love. The viewer, however, might be happier appreciating the image and not reading the wall caption. For there it is revealed that Benson set it up. “Spotting the hammock in the garden of the Governor’s Mansion,” it reads, “he persuaded Clinton and his wife Hillary to climb in.”He set it up and they were in on the setup. The whole thing is not so much the capture of a spontaneous, character-revealing moment as an elaborate exercise in image enhancement.You ask yourself, is the emotion presented in the photo all hokum? Is it a campaign ad flying under the colors of a news photograph with the corrupt complicity of and at the instigation of the photographer? Or is it only partial hokum, an act for the camera by two people who are certainly professional politicians but who also actually do have feelings for each other and who have had many moments like this?Either way, you liked the picture more when you thought of it as capturing the unguarded emotions of people in a complex relationship, before you started thinking of it as two complex people in a complex relationship engaging in a sales job.
Take, for example, his 1992 photo of Hillary and Bill Clinton. What you see is an awww-inspiring photo of two people who seem very much in love. The viewer, however, might be happier appreciating the image and not reading the wall caption. For there it is revealed that Benson set it up. “Spotting the hammock in the garden of the Governor’s Mansion,” it reads, “he persuaded Clinton and his wife Hillary to climb in.”
He set it up and they were in on the setup. The whole thing is not so much the capture of a spontaneous, character-revealing moment as an elaborate exercise in image enhancement.
You ask yourself, is the emotion presented in the photo all hokum? Is it a campaign ad flying under the colors of a news photograph with the corrupt complicity of and at the instigation of the photographer? Or is it only partial hokum, an act for the camera by two people who are certainly professional politicians but who also actually do have feelings for each other and who have had many moments like this?
Either way, you liked the picture more when you thought of it as capturing the unguarded emotions of people in a complex relationship, before you started thinking of it as two complex people in a complex relationship engaging in a sales job.
If they get elected, I’m moving back to Europe. OBAMA ’08
If they get elected, I’m moving back to Europe. OBAMA ’08
I suggest you get comfortable in the kitchen.Quite comfortable in the kitchen, thanks; naked or clothed!
I suggest you get comfortable in the kitchen.
Quite comfortable in the kitchen, thanks; naked or clothed!
I didn’t mean showing him up politically, i meant literally tearing his balls off. And I am quite comfortable in the kitchen. After all, it’s my girlfriend that has to cook in the nude.
I didn’t mean showing him up politically, i meant literally tearing his balls off.
And I am quite comfortable in the kitchen. After all, it’s my girlfriend that has to cook in the nude.
emasculating Bill? into the testicle lock box? FYI: We’re not in the 50s anymore!say what you will about Hillary’s policies, ideas, experience, but let me assure you, showing that you’re threatened by a powerful woman is utterly irrelevant. I suggest you get comfortable in the kitchen.
emasculating Bill? into the testicle lock box?
FYI: We’re not in the 50s anymore!
say what you will about Hillary’s policies, ideas, experience, but let me assure you, showing that you’re threatened by a powerful woman is utterly irrelevant.
I suggest you get comfortable in the kitchen.
Probably emasculating Bill, if I had to guess..into the “Testicle Lock Box” LOL
Probably emasculating Bill, if I had to guess
..into the “Testicle Lock Box” LOL
Well, at least today her outside is closer to representing her inside appearance.
Well, at least today her outside is closer to representing her inside appearance.
Probably emasculating Bill, if I had to guess.
Probably emasculating Bill, if I had to guess.
hahahaha anonymous@3:29. I love you.
hahahaha anonymous@3:29. I love you.
where’s hil’s right hand?
where’s hil’s right hand?
Justin – I also mistook those for your words, after the first paragraphs. Maybe it was the line breaks.
Justin – I also mistook those for your words, after the first paragraphs. Maybe it was the line breaks.
i like that you can see the imprint of the hammock on bill’s arm.
i like that you can see the imprint of the hammock on bill’s arm.
I don’t care how fucking cute they are, they’re still fucking fascists.
I don’t care how fucking cute they are, they’re still fucking fascists.
With respect, Anonymous @ 1:30, I didn’t “say” anything.Joel Garreau of the Washington Post wrote something about the photo, and I found it interesting. The words and beliefs are his. I would caution you against making assumptions about things that I’d “say” or “believe” based on an article published in the WaPo’s Arts section.I would also caution you against assuming that I “haven’t been paying attention.” :-P
With respect, Anonymous @ 1:30, I didn’t “say” anything.
Joel Garreau of the Washington Post wrote something about the photo, and I found it interesting. The words and beliefs are his. I would caution you against making assumptions about things that I’d “say” or “believe” based on an article published in the WaPo’s Arts section.
I would also caution you against assuming that I “haven’t been paying attention.” :-P
Justin: what you say is true, but if you still believe that photojournalism isn’t nearly always staged, then you haven’t been paying attention. Unless you want to openly question every photo you see – and feel free to do so, though it takes a lot of work – what matters most is the image itself. I certainly won’t go so far as to say that the method of production is irrelevant, but unless the photo is actively doctored or otherwise fraudulent then it’s pretty much fair game. In fact, I find it downright strange that the Post bothered to mention the circumstances surrounding the shot.
Justin: what you say is true, but if you still believe that photojournalism isn’t nearly always staged, then you haven’t been paying attention.
Unless you want to openly question every photo you see – and feel free to do so, though it takes a lot of work – what matters most is the image itself. I certainly won’t go so far as to say that the method of production is irrelevant, but unless the photo is actively doctored or otherwise fraudulent then it’s pretty much fair game. In fact, I find it downright strange that the Post bothered to mention the circumstances surrounding the shot.
I don’t know why, but I just can’t stand that woman
I don’t know why, but I just can’t stand that woman
god, people are so sad these days
god, people are so sad these days
From the Washington Post:Take, for example, his 1992 photo of Hillary and Bill Clinton. What you see is an awww-inspiring photo of two people who seem very much in love. The viewer, however, might be happier appreciating the image and not reading the wall caption. For there it is revealed that Benson set it up. “Spotting the hammock in the garden of the Governor’s Mansion,” it reads, “he persuaded Clinton and his wife Hillary to climb in.”He set it up and they were in on the setup. The whole thing is not so much the capture of a spontaneous, character-revealing moment as an elaborate exercise in image enhancement.You ask yourself, is the emotion presented in the photo all hokum? Is it a campaign ad flying under the colors of a news photograph with the corrupt complicity of and at the instigation of the photographer? Or is it only partial hokum, an act for the camera by two people who are certainly professional politicians but who also actually do have feelings for each other and who have had many moments like this?Either way, you liked the picture more when you thought of it as capturing the unguarded emotions of people in a complex relationship, before you started thinking of it as two complex people in a complex relationship engaging in a sales job.
From the Washington Post:
Take, for example, his 1992 photo of Hillary and Bill Clinton. What you see is an awww-inspiring photo of two people who seem very much in love. The viewer, however, might be happier appreciating the image and not reading the wall caption. For there it is revealed that Benson set it up. “Spotting the hammock in the garden of the Governor’s Mansion,” it reads, “he persuaded Clinton and his wife Hillary to climb in.”
He set it up and they were in on the setup. The whole thing is not so much the capture of a spontaneous, character-revealing moment as an elaborate exercise in image enhancement.
You ask yourself, is the emotion presented in the photo all hokum? Is it a campaign ad flying under the colors of a news photograph with the corrupt complicity of and at the instigation of the photographer? Or is it only partial hokum, an act for the camera by two people who are certainly professional politicians but who also actually do have feelings for each other and who have had many moments like this?
Either way, you liked the picture more when you thought of it as capturing the unguarded emotions of people in a complex relationship, before you started thinking of it as two complex people in a complex relationship engaging in a sales job.
start. puking. now.
start. puking. now.
i wonder who he’s thinking about in this picture…
i wonder who he’s thinking about in this picture…