NYT writes about Trolling

The New York Times Magazine will be publishing an article this Sunday about internet trolling, with a focus on /b/ and free speech.

/b/ reads like the inside of a high-school bathroom stall, or an obscene telephone party line, or a blog with no posts and all comments filled with slang that you are too old to understand.

….

Why inflict anguish on a helpless stranger? It’s tempting to blame technology, which increases the range of our communications while dehumanizing the recipients. Cases like An Hero and Megan Meier presumably wouldn’t happen if the perpetrators had to deliver their messages in person. But while technology reduces the social barriers that keep us from bedeviling strangers, it does not explain the initial trolling impulse. This seems to spring from something ugly — a destructive human urge that many feel but few act upon, the ambient misanthropy that’s a frequent ingredient of art, politics and, most of all, jokes. There’s a lot of hate out there, and a lot to hate as well.

It’s an interesting read.

[NYTimes: Malwebolence]

35 thoughts on “NYT writes about Trolling

  1. Anonymous

    That Guy name Weev looks like a fucking retard. He talks about eliminating 4 billion people, he should be the first of the to get the ax.

  2. Anonymous

    That Guy name Weev looks like a fucking retard. He talks about eliminating 4 billion people, he should be the first of the to get the ax.

  3. Anonymous

    That Guy name Weev looks like a fucking retard. He talks about eliminating 4 billion people, he should be the first of the to get the ax.

  4. Isaac

    @10:58: You don’t normally get to meet these people in real life, but they have some crazy ideas. Reading would be nice, but these guys seem to be almost beyond help.

  5. Isaac

    @10:58: You don’t normally get to meet these people in real life, but they have some crazy ideas. Reading would be nice, but these guys seem to be almost beyond help.

  6. Isaac

    @10:58: You don’t normally get to meet these people in real life, but they have some crazy ideas. Reading would be nice, but these guys seem to be almost beyond help.

  7. Anonymous

    10:52, yes, it makes sense. the second part means that hate is complicated. definitely had to read it twice to get it.

  8. Anonymous

    10:52, yes, it makes sense. the second part means that hate is complicated. definitely had to read it twice to get it.

  9. Anonymous

    10:52, yes, it makes sense. the second part means that hate is complicated. definitely had to read it twice to get it.

  10. Anonymous

    There’s a lot of hate out there, and a lot to hate as well.Does this make sense to other people??

  11. Anonymous

    There’s a lot of hate out there, and a lot to hate as well.Does this make sense to other people??

  12. Anonymous

    There’s a lot of hate out there, and a lot to hate as well.

    Does this make sense to other people??

Comments are closed.