Tonight, the WSA will discuss possibilities for ways Wesleyan could use its facilities to bring in revenue during the summer. One idea would be to offer the option of an abbreviated summer semester where students could take 3 classes in exchange for lowered tuition. Come to the WSA tonight to discuss this idea and others as we brainstorm possibilities for how Wesleyan can deal with its current financial woes.
What: WSA General Assembly
When: 7pm
Where: Usdan 108
(Visited 26 times, 1 visits today)
NO J-TERM! nooooogo to williams or middlebury if you want a j-term
NO J-TERM! nooooogo to williams or middlebury if you want a j-term
NO J-TERM! nooooo
go to williams or middlebury if you want a j-term
YES I VOTE FOR A J-TERM TOO (even though it kind of has nothing to do with this)
YES I VOTE FOR A J-TERM TOO (even though it kind of has nothing to do with this)
YES I VOTE FOR A J-TERM TOO (even though it kind of has nothing to do with this)
and a j-term!
and a j-term!
and a j-term!
i would love for there to be summer semester courses at wes.
i would love for there to be summer semester courses at wes.
i would love for there to be summer semester courses at wes.
@5:09 It’s kind of like that, yes.@5:03 WSA members will be explaining the idea in detail tonight, so please come to our meeting to learn more!
@5:09 It’s kind of like that, yes.@5:03 WSA members will be explaining the idea in detail tonight, so please come to our meeting to learn more!
@5:09 It’s kind of like that, yes.
@5:03 WSA members will be explaining the idea in detail tonight, so please come to our meeting to learn more!
Presumably, Wes currently brings in $0 tuition over the summer, so some > nothing.
Presumably, Wes currently brings in $0 tuition over the summer, so some > nothing.
Presumably, Wes currently brings in $0 tuition over the summer, so some > nothing.
isn’t the “in exchange for lowered tuition” part kind of defeating the purpose of bringing in revenue over the summer?maybe i’m misunderstanding something
isn’t the “in exchange for lowered tuition” part kind of defeating the purpose of bringing in revenue over the summer?maybe i’m misunderstanding something
isn’t the “in exchange for lowered tuition” part kind of defeating the purpose of bringing in revenue over the summer?
maybe i’m misunderstanding something