Yeah, the NYT had an article on how teachers are using it as a tool to start conversations about sustainability, because many science textbooks are woefully behind. At 20 minutes, its perfect for a lesson plan.
In the ideal scenario, I think it would provoke both thought and criticism from kids, rather than blind acceptance of propaganda. Ya know, get the conversation moving.
Anonymous
Yeah, the NYT had an article on how teachers are using it as a tool to start conversations about sustainability, because many science textbooks are woefully behind. At 20 minutes, its perfect for a lesson plan.
In the ideal scenario, I think it would provoke both thought and criticism from kids, rather than blind acceptance of propaganda. Ya know, get the conversation moving.
Anonymous
#7: I’m pretty sure it’s aimed at children.
Anonymous
#7: I’m pretty sure it’s aimed at children.
Anonymous
To 9:50:
If you read the credits, the lady who performed it also wrote it. I’m thinking that’s just how she dresses and she wanted to say what she wrote instead of having some random actress do it for her.
Anonymous
To 9:50:
If you read the credits, the lady who performed it also wrote it. I’m thinking that’s just how she dresses and she wanted to say what she wrote instead of having some random actress do it for her.
Anonymous
Could she talk down to us any more?
Anonymous
Could she talk down to us any more?
Anonymous
ready for a full assessment?
1. the woman’s voice is really annoying and it’s clear they got the most mainstreamly-dressed woman ever to narrate so that it wouldn’t seem too hippie. god forbid.
2. the narration is all over the place. is it about the environment or business or government? who knows. it’s a full-on rant that no one has 20 minutes to listen to.
3. the only people that would watch this anyway are already liberals so it’s really not accomplishing anything. preaching to the choir.
4. i like it. it’s cute.
Anonymous
ready for a full assessment?
1. the woman’s voice is really annoying and it’s clear they got the most mainstreamly-dressed woman ever to narrate so that it wouldn’t seem too hippie. god forbid.
2. the narration is all over the place. is it about the environment or business or government? who knows. it’s a full-on rant that no one has 20 minutes to listen to.
3. the only people that would watch this anyway are already liberals so it’s really not accomplishing anything. preaching to the choir.
4. i like it. it’s cute.
Anonymous
let’s just post everything the NY Times writes about…
Anonymous
let’s just post everything the NY Times writes about…
Anonymous
Why is this shit atrocious?
Anonymous
Why is this shit atrocious?
hah
“Brominated flame retardants”
hah
“Brominated flame retardants”
Anonymous
this shit is atrocious
Anonymous
this shit is atrocious
JaconPost author
Shameless propaganda? Perhaps. At least it’s shameless liberal propaganda.
Yeah, the NYT had an article on how teachers are using it as a tool to start conversations about sustainability, because many science textbooks are woefully behind. At 20 minutes, its perfect for a lesson plan.
In the ideal scenario, I think it would provoke both thought and criticism from kids, rather than blind acceptance of propaganda. Ya know, get the conversation moving.
Yeah, the NYT had an article on how teachers are using it as a tool to start conversations about sustainability, because many science textbooks are woefully behind. At 20 minutes, its perfect for a lesson plan.
In the ideal scenario, I think it would provoke both thought and criticism from kids, rather than blind acceptance of propaganda. Ya know, get the conversation moving.
#7: I’m pretty sure it’s aimed at children.
#7: I’m pretty sure it’s aimed at children.
To 9:50:
If you read the credits, the lady who performed it also wrote it. I’m thinking that’s just how she dresses and she wanted to say what she wrote instead of having some random actress do it for her.
To 9:50:
If you read the credits, the lady who performed it also wrote it. I’m thinking that’s just how she dresses and she wanted to say what she wrote instead of having some random actress do it for her.
Could she talk down to us any more?
Could she talk down to us any more?
ready for a full assessment?
1. the woman’s voice is really annoying and it’s clear they got the most mainstreamly-dressed woman ever to narrate so that it wouldn’t seem too hippie. god forbid.
2. the narration is all over the place. is it about the environment or business or government? who knows. it’s a full-on rant that no one has 20 minutes to listen to.
3. the only people that would watch this anyway are already liberals so it’s really not accomplishing anything. preaching to the choir.
4. i like it. it’s cute.
ready for a full assessment?
1. the woman’s voice is really annoying and it’s clear they got the most mainstreamly-dressed woman ever to narrate so that it wouldn’t seem too hippie. god forbid.
2. the narration is all over the place. is it about the environment or business or government? who knows. it’s a full-on rant that no one has 20 minutes to listen to.
3. the only people that would watch this anyway are already liberals so it’s really not accomplishing anything. preaching to the choir.
4. i like it. it’s cute.
let’s just post everything the NY Times writes about…
let’s just post everything the NY Times writes about…
Why is this shit atrocious?
Why is this shit atrocious?
“Brominated flame retardants”
“Brominated flame retardants”
this shit is atrocious
this shit is atrocious
Shameless propaganda? Perhaps. At least it’s shameless liberal propaganda.